-
M. Secaur
The most magical musical ever to grace the stage
It simply does not get any better than the original London Cast Recording of the Phantom of the Opera. I have been listening to this show since I was five years old, and today I love it as much as I did then. Even before I saw this show live, I felt as if I had after enjoying this CD set. Since that time I have seen and heard many musicals, and nothing has captured the excitement, the wonder, the magic, or the mystery quite like The Phantom of the Opera. It is a show beyond compare, one that draws you in and takes you on a journey into the imagination. I don’t believe that there will ever be anything like it again.To say that “Phantom” is a musical made in heaven or that it is a masterpiece of our age is never an overstatement. The stars seemed aligned perfectly (pun intended) at the time of this endeavor, with every detail, even the most minute, finessed to the highest degree of theatrical and musical excellency.Andrew Lloyd Webber truly outdid himself, both in style and composition. While many of his previous and consequent works feel dated and sound so time specific, “Phantom” is astoundingly timeless. The romantic lyrics by Charles Hart and Richard Stilgoe are descriptive and haunting, and coupled with Lloyd Webber’s amazing score makes for a musical that refuses to be forgotten. It seems safe to say that it appears that nothing will ever surpass it in its beauty, majesty, romanticism and piognancy, even something written by Mr. Webber himself!I am an obsessive listener of this show and barely let a day pass without listening to at least part of it–yet I never grow tired of it. The music is memorable and timeless, and the singers perfect and lovely every moment. The score is lush and thrilling, and gives me goosebumps every time.Michael Crawford as the Phantom and Sarah Brightman as Christine are simply incomparable in their roles as the two principal characters. They both have the most angelic voices I have ever heard, voices that are like no one else on earth. To me, they are two of the most talented performers of our century, and to have them perform together on one album is just a combination made in heaven.Michael Crawford will always be THE Phantom for me. His haunting tenor is so sweet and light it’s like listening to an angel. It is impossible not to be moved every time, his voice is just so beautiful. I don’t think it is physically possible for sour notes to ever fall from his silvery throat. He sings so smoothly and evenly and with such grace that at times his voice could easily be mistaken for a woman’s, yet it still remains undeniably masculine. He can make even the fiercest passage sound beautiful. His skill in sustaining notes never fails to amaze me, and makes me wonder why this man never was given more parts in theatre that showcased this marvelous talent quite so well. Truly, he has a divine gift for music, and this uniqueness and adaptability makes him one of my all-time favorite singers, not to mention the perfect choice to play the title character. Anyone who says he isn’t emotive enough as an actor should listen to more of his work on this album. He completely becomes the Phantom; he doesn’t just play him. He makes the Phantom a real person, not just a man on a stage. His total embodiment of the disfigured genius results in a deep-set passion that is instantaneously noticable in all of the Phantom’s vocal moments, whether booming with rage or soft and romantic with ardor. He brings a real life and feeling to a character who otherwise could come off as little more than a hideous madman luring an innocent prima donna to her doom.Sarah Brightman on the other hand is equally as unique. Her soprano is so crystalline and pure it’s hard to believe she’s actually human. Her range gets into some problematically high notes with ease but is never shrieky. Her voice is one that strums the heartstrings, and her passion is equal to that of her male vocal partner.Together, their chemistry is amazing. You can feel the electricity between them as they sing, especially noticeable on “The Point of No Return”. Their unique connection is one that I have yet to hear in any current companies of the show.The other singers on the album shine, and make for a solid and complimentary cast behind the two outstanding principals.I read Gaston Leroux’s book after hearing the score, but I was happy to find how faithful the adaptation was in the story’s leap from page to stage. The feeling is creepy and mysterious, and the enigma of the Phantom still remains long after we have seen him with our own eyes and have concluded that he is flesh and blood. There is romance, jealousy, drama, and murder, but the core moral is good one: beauty is not always on the surface, and even the ugliest deserve to be loved.Although I love every single track of this show, I want to highlight some of the numbers that are especially meaningful to me.One taste of the “Overture” and you know instantly that found your way into the Phantom’s world. The unmistakable chords signal the power and majesty to come with no hint of any respite from the darkness and villany, but, despite the ominous foreshadowing, the light is to come through.”Think of Me” is begun softly but builds into a roaring crescendo. The first introduction of Christine is done gently but powerfully; The final cadenza at the finale is perfection and soars to a lovely, operatic close.”Angel of Music”, which begins as a light back-and-forth conversation between Christine and Meg grows into a stirring confrontation with the Phantom himself is undoubtedly one of my favorite moments from the show. The simple, sprightly tune is easy enough to whistle, yet is one of the most lyrical melodies Webber has ever composed.From there, the music takes a turn to the more rock-inspired. The title song has a steady, compelling beat without being too out-of-place in the world of 1880’s Paris. Crawford and Brightman’s voices are perfectly blended, and they totally embody their roles as pupil and music-master. Their voices are fresh and passionate and never demure. They hold nothing back and are yet not overbearing. The Phantom’s “sing for me…”, hissed passionately toward the closing chord of Christine’s high note, always makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck.”Music of the Night” is perhaps one of the most beautiful songs ever written, and without a doubt top on my list of favorites. Although it was originally meant for for a woman to sing in another of ALW’s shows, the decision of putting it in the masterful hands of Mr. Crawford just brings it to a whole new level. He takes on each passage with an effortless grace and brings the full majesty and loveliness of the piece to the forefront. One can believe they have truly found paradise when they hear him sing those immortal words, “You alone can make my song take flight. Help me make the music of the night.” He really makes it his song and his alone–It couldn’t have sounded better if it had been written especially for him.”Prima Donna” is a humorous if brief diversion from the ever-present darkness of the Phantom. It is reminiscent of a Gilbert and Sullivan banter-song, but is brought back to reality by the Phantom’s booming warning during the final chords.”All I Ask of You” is a fittingly romantic duet between the two young lovers. The lyrics are simple and sweet, and convey the proper emotions without being sappy. In other words, it feels like a true love song. The reprise is even more affecting, and brings the first act to a literally crashing close.The “Entr’acte” is one of the best I’ve heard in any musical or opera. It showcases some well-orchestrated instrumentals of the principal themes from the show in a beautiful arrangement.”Masquerade” is a unique tune that is difficult to describe or compare, but is one of the most hummable. It is bright and colorful, but, as always, the Phantom is always looming over, and the jaunty thread soon turns ominous as he begins to descend the grand staircase, dressed in the guise of the Masque of the Red Death. You can feel every step he takes as the strings pluck darkly over his descent, finally culminating in a flaring cresendo of anger and fear.Christine’s lament in the graveyard during “Wishing You Were Somehow Here Again” is one of sweetness and longing, and is done very well by Sarah Brightman. Though I like the revised version (where the final line of the song is repeated), there is nothing I can find that flaws her performance here.Perhaps it is the reintroduction of “Angel of Music”, but the “Wandering Child” track gets me every time. The way it builds from a gentle beckoning to a powerful, almost hopeful love-duet before Raoul intervenes to save the day is strangely moving.”The Point of No Return” is perhaps the most passionate of all the pieces. Done as an opera-within-an-opera, the romantic tension only builds with each bar, ending with the Phantom’s longing solo reprise of “All I Ask Of You”. Crawford’s stealthy seductiveness and Brightman’s eager vivaciousness couple together to create a highly charged atmosphere. You really feel as if she is really prepared to give herself up to Don Juan/The Phantom’s advances.The “Finale” is as spectacular as any in a grand opera. The weaving of leitmotifs is a nostalgic nod to every previous moment that came before it, and creates a tension between the three main characters that makes a worthy climax to the rest of the show. The final repetition of Music of the Night always brings tears to my eyes, the Phantom’s last line is so touching. “….It’s over now, the music of the night.”In conclusion, The Phantom of the Opera paints a vivid picture in your mind with its superb score, stirring lyrics, wonderful cast, and a compelling story that keeps you hanging on, breathlessly, until the very last moment. Forget any other recording; buy this one. Classics never go out of style, and I don’t see this one vanishing into oblivion any time soon. You do have to have the proper imagination to appreciate this story–Some people, I know, find that Phantom is not their cup of tea–but you can’t possibly please everybody. Speaking for myself, I am totally satisfied. It excites my imagination to no end with its thrilling story, superb cast, and soaring music. It is a timeless tale with timeless music that will never grow old, and I encourage those who have yet to discover it to take a listen.
-
Melodie J.
Great Sound!
Good quality! Very fast shipping!
-
Beverly Underwood
Great album, great quality
The best one ever done in my opinion! Love this!
-
Katy
Fast delivery, great condition
Shipped super fast, arrived in time to be a wedding gift. Fantastic price for an out of print item. Thank you!!!
-
iashutterbug
Crawford & Brightman.. NOBODY DOES IT BETTER
We’ve seen the play at least 8 times, and obviously love it. This brings back the whole play in my mind, as I listen to it..After seeing it that often, mostly in Los Angeles, North Orange County CA, and Once in London… Listening to this, I can visualize the actors moving around the stage.This is the best of the lot, with Michael Crawford’s extraordinary voice, and also with the stunningly beautiful voice of Sarah Brightman, who we’ve also seen perform on stage.Note: Play information, If planning on seeing a performance. There is now a newer version of the play, having been re-staged to play shorter runs of 2 weeks or so. All the staging is easier to pack up, and move, allowing shorter runs. Some of the music in this newer version, is also abbreviated, as well. It is good, but I missed the parts that were cut out or, trimmed to make shorter. I missed the grand staircase in the opening of the 2nd act.If you haven’t seen it, you won’t miss anything, but I sure did. But this is the original Phantom, as his greatest, and the original Christine..NOBODY DOES IT BETTER THAN BRIGHTMAN AND CRAWFORD. And here it is. Get it.
-
Amazon Customer
75% more words! And 20% less carbs!
At the time that I’m writing this review there are 379 reviews for the original 1986 London cast recording of “The Phantom of the Opera”. It can be safely surmised that many people have opinions about this particular hallmark of musical theater. It also seems requisite that any reviews written after 2004 must bring up the movie soundtrack and compare the two leads, with varying levels of love for one and hate for the other. I shall attempt to summarize some of the more frequently repeated comments here, attempting to adhere to bare facts while impressing as little opinion as possible into what is a very personal musical.Fact: This is a girl’s musical.Okay, you can stop throwing things at me now.Point in case is that this musical appeals to females more than males, even more than most musical theater. Yes, men, real men even, still love this musical however, they are minority. The tunes are melodic, the story is a dramatic love triangle, and the lyrics are poetic and sentimental, which are all elements generally preferred by non-males. This is in no way disparaging to musical itself, but does affect matters of personal taste.Fact: Sarah Brightman has rare high range, utilizes vibrato often, hits high notes smoothly and easily, and whose ennunciation is poor.Basically, Sarah sings the role as singer first rather than an actress. Her role rival, Emmy Rossum sings as an actress first. Emmy also has a smaller range and a warmer tone. Emmy was also the appropriate age for the part, being sixteen and seventeen during filming, while Sarah was twenty-six the year Phantom debuted. Something else to keep in mind is that Andrew Lloyd Webber really wrote this musical for Sarah, particularlly because of how impressed he was with her vocal range.Fact: Michael Crawford is a strong tenor who also has an amazing range, does not emote excessively, and whose “Music Of the Night” is legendary.Few people have ranges like Michael and Sarah. Gerard Butler is really more of a high baritone/low tenor voice, yet still he performed all the songs in the original key. Gerard is very emotive, and sings the songs in the manor befitting an actor.Fact: Stage recordings are never as good as live performances, and studio recordings, (such as the movie soundtrack) are going to be a lot more polished.Fact: Great supporting cast, particularly the in roles of Carlotta (Rosemary Ashe) and Raoul (Steve Barton).Rosemary is obviously very well trained in opera, enough to turn a strong voice into a believably weak one, which is far less easy than it sounds.Fact: The plot does not always quite make sense.The novel by Gaston Leroux was originally a lighter satire, and while enjoyable, not any exceptional piece of literature. At the time the musical was written several versions of the story had been produced to good sucess, and Andrew and his team were trying to create a more original production. Some of the story was altered in places in order to condense or to make more palatable the original script. The movie ameliorates this slightly by providing a bit more back story to the phantom. As to Raoul just standing there as the Phantom ties him up, the fact that the premier site at the time in the city of art has employed a very mediocre soprano for several seasons, whythe police don’t capture the phantom while he’s busy singing “Past the Point of No Return”, and similar questions, to this I can only say, it’s theater. It does’t have to make sense, it just has to entertain.Fact: this musical has not only lasted, but thrived, for two decades now.That says a lot for anything in pop culture, which by definition is something ephemeral. Apparently it has something to offer that is not defined by zeitgeist.In closing I would like to offer that both this version and the movie version are valuable in different ways, however I think that this version should appeal more to fans of musicals and to people who have more musical training, while the movie soundtrack should appeal to younger fans, especially those whose musical taste runs toward pop.
-
Charles B.
The convenience it offers.
Nothing to dislike about this great musical. I have it on vinyl, but having it on a CD let’s me download it on my PC and then transfer it to a thumb drive to use in my car.
-
music lover
Clean
well wrapped & clean